By Hanna Liebman Dershowitz
During the holiday of Purim, celebrated this week, Jews recount the story of Esther, a secretly Jewish woman who becomes queen, and the choices she makes to save her people. Esther’s actions were aimed at gaining acceptance for a minority religion that was reviled, and preventing the murder of its members. Even today, the echoes of Esther’s story are powerful and enduring. But she might be surprised to learn how the concept of religious freedom is being used now—not to protect minority religious practice or combat religious intolerance, but to give special exceptions from laws designed to prevent intolerance or provide needed services to all people.
Indeed, this year, on the day Purim begins, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on an important case relating to reproductive health access, in particular contraceptive coverage. Zubik v. Burwell considers whether religiously affiliated organizations can successfully claim that their religious expression rights would be violated if they filled out a government form. The form in question is designed to accommodate the organizations’ objections to providing their employees with coverage for contraception, which is a requirement of the Affordable Care Act. The petitioners in the seven consolidated cases object to providing contraceptive coverage, and argue in Zubik that filling out the form is in itself unduly burdensome on their religious practices, because providing the information triggers the coverage for their employees to be provided by someone else. Their logic is like that of a conscientious objector in a war refusing to tell the government she will not serve, because if she does, that means the government will send someone in her place. Having to register the objection in some way may be a burden, but arguably only logistically, not in a moral or religious sense.
My organization, Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA), long has been committed to supporting bold choices, even ones that don’t free an entire people. JCPA strongly supports a woman’s right to make her own reproductive decisions, and has opposed efforts to deny access to reproductive rights, contraception, and family planning services. In the Zubik case, JCPA joined with the AJC, Union for Reform Judaism, and Central Conference of American Rabbis in an amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief explaining why the accommodation does not impose a substantial burden on the petitioners’ exercise of religion. In 2014, JCPA participated in a brief on the predecessor to this case, Hobby Lobby, also with AJC. Though these briefs represent the broad consensus view in the Jewish community, some of JCPA's member agencies, including the Orthodox Union, have not taken a position on the central issue in these cases. JCPA has been involved in dozens of civil rights cases, including serving as a plaintiff in a seminal school prayer case, Engel v. Vitale. JCPA is concerned that access to medical care coverage for essential health needs could be curtailed if the Court does not rule favorably in the Zubik case.
Click here to read the rest of this op-ed published in the Jewish Journal
Comments
Check Cashing Spring-Valley
replica watches
problemi di erezione a 60 anni cosa fare
kkk
michael kors outlet store
ed hardy uk
rolex replica watches
coach outlet online
mcm outlet online
converse all star
christian louboutin shoes
fitflops sale
cheap uggs
timberland outlet
pandora outlet
coach factory outlet online
hugo boss outlet online
uggs outlet
michael kors purse
coach factory outlet online
toms outlet store
ray ban glasses
cheap jerseys wholesale
red bottom heels
jimmy choo shoes
ralph lauren outlet online
adidas superstars
birkenstocks
ugg outlet
pandora bracelet
cheap ray bans
michael kors outlet store
moncler pas cher
coach outlet online
true religion outlet store
coach outlet store online
longchamp handbags
michael kors handbags clearance
canada goose
pandora charms
cheap oakley sunglasses
ugg boots outlet
polo ralph lauren outlet
birkenstock outlet
louis vuitton outlet online
kobe bryant shoes
adidas store
ugg boots sale
jordan uk
jordan shoes
mlb jerseys
michael kors outlet store
cheap jerseys
ugg boots sale
ugg outlet
coach factory outlet online
polo ralph lauren
birkenstock outlet
louis vuitton uk
north face jackets
pandora charms sale clearance
cheap ray ban sunglasses
celine handbags
uggs on sale
ugg outlet
polo ralph lauren
cheap ugg boots
moncler jackets
abercrombie
canada goose outlet
adidas outlet store
michael kors outlet clearance
oakley sunglasses cheap
stan smith adidas
birkenstock
polo ralph lauren pas cher
michael kors outlet online
adidas yeezy boost 350
adidas yeezy boost
cheap oakley sunglasses
polo ralph lauren outlet
polo ralph lauren
michael kors handbags outlet
uggs outlet
coach factory outlet online
uggs outlet
lacoste outlet
armani exchange outlet
birkenstock shoes
michael kors outlet online
michael kors purses
ray bans
cheap nike shoes
coach outlet online
coach outlet store
pandora charms
cheap nike sneakers
uggs
louis vuitton outlet online
ugg australia
james shoes
ralph lauren outlet online
uggs
nike outlet
red bottom
michael kors
uggs outlet
Replica Rolex
christian louboutin outlet
coach outlet store online
ugg australia boots
polo ralph lauren outlet
discount oakley sunglasses
hollister co
ugg sale
oakley sunglasses wholesale
canada goose jackets
polo ralph lauren outlet online
discount oakley sunglasses
michael kors uk
oakley sunglasses outlet
ed hardy outlet
michael kors handbags outlet
ysl outlet store
ugg boots clearance
christian louboutin outlet